Skip to main content
NSAG / Modules / M4 · Cannabis Public Health
M4 Healthcare & Clinical

Cannabis Public Health Infrastructure

Cannabis is pharmacologically active in about 35% of your patient population. It is documented in about 5% of their medical records. The gap is an institutional design problem.

View Assessment Status → See the Evidence
The Governance Problem

Why This Module Exists

The cannabis documentation gap has a verified primary source: Lapham et al. (2022) found that 35.1% of primary care patients reported implicit medical cannabis use while only 4.8% had EHR documentation — from the same patient population, measured simultaneously. Cannabis is metabolized through cytochrome P450 pathways shared with warfarin, antiepileptics, antidepressants, antifungals, and immunosuppressants. Prescribing decisions are being made without complete pharmacological information in a significant proportion of patients. The governance response addresses the institutional design failures that create the gap, so the fix sits with the system rather than with patients who don't disclose.

Evidence Base

The Research Foundation

Lapham et al. (2022)
JAMA Network Open DOI →

35.1% implicit medical cannabis use vs. 4.8% EHR-documented. Verified 7:1 gap from the same patient population.

Boehnke, Litinas & Clauw (2016)
Journal of Pain DOI →

64% decrease in opioid use among 244 medical cannabis patients. Clinically significant and pharmacologically invisible without screening.

VanDolah, Bauer & Mauck (2019)
Mayo Clinic Proceedings DOI →

CYP450 pathways: CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP1A2. Documented interaction risk with warfarin, antiepileptics, and immunosuppressants.

Six Governance Dimensions

What the Assessment Measures

The prototype organizes reflection across six proposed governance dimensions. It does not produce a validated institutional score, audit, accreditation, or certification.

1 Cannabis Screening Standards
2 Provider Training Standards
3 EHR Documentation Architecture
4 Disclosure Safety Infrastructure
5 Regulatory Compliance & Legal Review
6 Quality Improvement Metrics
PIONEERING Governance

What the Highest Tier Looks Like

PIONEERING — Fully Implemented Governance

Validated cannabis screening at every patient contact (≥85% completion); all providers trained in CYP450 interactions within 2 years; structured EHR cannabis fields (≥85% completion); written disclosure safety policy communicated at intake; documented legal guidance updated within 3 years; cannabis documentation rate as tracked QI metric.

The full tier operationalization — PIONEERING through EARLY STAGE, with specific observable criteria for all six dimensions — is documented in the Framework Foundation.

Who Should Prioritize This Module

Built for These Institutions — and the People Inside Them

Primary care practices · Hospitals and health systems · FQHCs · Pharmacy programs · Cannabis healthcare providers · State health departments · EHR vendors

And any patient carrying an undocumented interaction. If you use cannabis and it isn’t in your chart, this governance is what closes the gap before it reaches a decision about your care.

Related Modules

What to Assess Next

M9 Cannabis Healthcare Visibility M8 Burnout Recovery Infrastructure M13 Traditional & Complementary Medicine Governance

Review the M4 assessment prototype.

Review the module scope and proposed dimensions. The assessment remains an educational prototype; no email report or institutional finding is active.

View Assessment Status → Book a Discovery Call